<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mike mcquaid dot com &#187; Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mikemcquaid.com/category/politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mikemcquaid.com</link>
	<description>the internet is leaking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 20:32:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Military Protests</title>
		<link>http://mikemcquaid.com/2009/03/military-protests/</link>
		<comments>http://mikemcquaid.com/2009/03/military-protests/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 13:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikearthur.co.uk/?p=323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of you may have read about the protests of returning troops to England from Iraq last week. They were greeted by a friendly welcome by the majority with a minority holding signs describing them as &#8220;Butchers&#8221; and &#8220;Terrorists&#8220;. I read this and felt torn. On one hand the protesters are voicing their complaints against [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of you may have read about the <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/beds/bucks/herts/7936485.stm">protests of returning troops to England from Iraq last week</a>. They were greeted by a friendly welcome by the majority with a minority holding signs describing them as &#8220;<em>Butchers</em>&#8221; and &#8220;<em>Terrorists</em>&#8220;.</p>
<p>I read this and felt torn. On one hand the protesters are voicing their complaints against the British Army&#8217;s part in <strong>death of thousands of civilians</strong>. On the other hand they are raising the issue in a hugely polarising way which probably does more damage to their cause than aid it. After this brief pondering I returned to my week.</p>
<p>Over the following days the typical figureheads gave their sound-bites to the media about how awful this was and about how the protesters should be ashamed of themselves. Gordon Brown made one of his stereotypical comments, trying desperately to prove that he can do something right to a increasingly disappointed public. Basically, an fairly expected reaction.</p>
<p>What was unexpected was today&#8217;s story about <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Davis_(British_politician)">David Davis MP</a> calling for it to become <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7943486.stm">a crime to <strong>incite hatred</strong> of serving soldiers</a>. &#8220;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incitement_to_ethnic_or_racial_hatred#United_Kingdom">Inciting hatred</a>&#8221; is the clever new way to sweeten further restrictions of our free speech in a way the public will seemingly happily accept. David Davis admitted personal concerns about the war but insists that British soldiers are &#8220;<em>our finest young men and women, the cream of society</em>&#8220;.</p>
<p>Personally, I believe that most soldiers are brave men and women. I don&#8217;t think that they are necessarily finer people than the doctors or members of the emergency services who save lives daily but that&#8217;s another debate. I&#8217;m came pretty close to joining the military myself. I had several successful interviews with the British Army and was one away from a university bursary which would have got me a place in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Military_Academy_Sandhurst">Sandhurst</a> after graduation. Despite my current pacifist leanings I respect the opinion of those disagree and I respect those in the military.</p>
<p>The initial reasons given for the Iraq war have been revealed as <strong>mistaken at best and outright deceit at worst</strong>. Iraq is turning into a nightmare with thousands upon thousands of civilians displaced or killed. There are several accounts of Iraqis describing Iraq under Saddam as a better place to live. If more of the military had been men like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malcolm_Kendall-Smith">Malcolm Kendall-Smith</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Griffin_(former_British_soldier)">Ben Griffin</a> then perhaps we wouldn&#8217;t have this disaster our hands. </p>
<p>This is why at the next election I will be voting for a <a href="http://www.libdems.org.uk/">party that campaigned against the Iraq war</a> and is putting forward a bill to repeal some of the laws that have reduced our civil liberties. It&#8217;s time to take a stand against these attempts by Labour and the Conservatives to further reduce our freedom and increase their power. It&#8217;s time for the government of this country to be led by a party that stands for the rule of international law and respects the rights of the citizens of this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mikemcquaid.com/2009/03/military-protests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Swears In</title>
		<link>http://mikemcquaid.com/2009/02/obama-swears-in/</link>
		<comments>http://mikemcquaid.com/2009/02/obama-swears-in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 01:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikearthur.co.uk/?p=288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry to post this but it was too amusing not to share. In Obama&#8217;s autobiography he quotes a friend who used to swear a lot. Obama read&#8217;s the audiobook version of his own book. Hilarity results here. (I&#8217;m not saying swearing is good/bad or that Obama is therefore good/bad because of this. However I&#8217;m still [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://mikearthur.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/obam-super.jpg" alt="Obama posing as Superman" title="Obama Superman" width="375" height="259"/><br />
Sorry to post this but it was too amusing not to share.</p>
<p>In Obama&#8217;s autobiography he quotes a friend who used to <strong>swear a lot</strong>. Obama read&#8217;s the audiobook version of his own book. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.aprilwinchell.com/2009/02/05/barack-obama-is-tired-of-your-motherfucking-shit/">Hilarity results here.</a></p>
<p>(<em>I&#8217;m not saying swearing is good/bad or that Obama is therefore good/bad because of this. However I&#8217;m <strong>still childish</strong> enough that this makes me giggle like an idiot&#8230;</em>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mikemcquaid.com/2009/02/obama-swears-in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bad Phorm</title>
		<link>http://mikemcquaid.com/2008/09/bad-phorm/</link>
		<comments>http://mikemcquaid.com/2008/09/bad-phorm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 22:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[My Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software Development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikearthur.co.uk/?p=156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So apparently the UK government doesn&#8217;t care about a private company wiretapping its citizens and giving them to another company (for money) as long as when they roll it out to everyone they are sure to ask for permission first (i.e. most probably at the end of a huge EULA). I can&#8217;t say I&#8217;m surprised [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://mikearthur.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/no_phorm.png" alt="No Phorm" width="200" height="189" /><br />
So apparently the UK government <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7619297.stm">doesn&#8217;t care</a> about a <strong><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phorm">private company wiretapping its citizens</a></strong> and giving them to another company (for money) as long as when they roll it out to everyone they are sure to ask for permission first (i.e. most probably at the end of a <strong>huge EULA</strong>).</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t say I&#8217;m surprised but I am pretty disappointed. When it first <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/04/01/bt_phorm_2006_trial/">emerged on The Register</a> that Phorm had been monitoring the internet communications of BT customers I was a BT employee. When it came out that <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/03/17/bt_phorm_lies/">BT outright lied</a> on to those tech-savvy customers who raised the issue my opinions of my employer had sadly dropped to an <strong>all-time low</strong>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not someone who believes in publicly criticising the company I am currently working for (partly because the company I work for currently is <a href="http://www.mendeley.com/">awesome</a>) and didn&#8217;t want to straight after I left at the risk of seeming bitter or unprofessional but I feel it needs to be publicly stated that I <strong>did not at any time agree</strong> with the actions that were being taken by my current employer and everything negative I found out second-hand and eventually was part of the reason I left.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure what the management of BT that thought that Phorm was a good idea were up to at the time but I feel they may need a little reminding that <strong>massively alienating</strong> a huge portion of your technical user-base is probably <strong>not the best way</strong> to run an ISP, considering how much influence we have on our non-geeky friends&#8217; technology choices.</p>
<p>As for their &#8220;anonymous&#8221; technology, if I&#8217;m &#8220;anonymous&#8221; enough for you to be able to track me across multiple IPs then <strong>I&#8217;m not &#8220;anonymous&#8221;</strong>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mikemcquaid.com/2008/09/bad-phorm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aged 15, Life Over</title>
		<link>http://mikemcquaid.com/2008/07/aged-15-life-over/</link>
		<comments>http://mikemcquaid.com/2008/07/aged-15-life-over/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikearthur.co.uk/?p=215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw an interesting article on BBC News today, I encourage you to read it before continuing. Maybe it&#8217;s just me but when I was 15 I did some very stupid things. Some involved girls, some involved computers and some involved fire. I was a bit of an idiot. Thankfully I was never in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw an <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7507216.stm">interesting article on BBC News today</a>, I encourage you to read it before continuing.</p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s just me but when I was 15 I did some <strong>very stupid things</strong>. Some involved girls, some involved computers and some involved fire. I was a bit of an idiot.</p>
<p>Thankfully I was never in the wrong place at the wrong time and never did anything as stupid as throwing a grenade at an American soldier.</p>
<p>Even if this kid did what it is claimed he did, he was <strong>15</strong> at the time. <strong>15</strong>! 3 more years of being a <strong>child</strong>. 8 more years before he can drink in the US. This Canadian citizen has been held for 6 years now and awaits the potential of life in prison. He is being held in a camp that seems to live outside international law and claims to have been tortured, something I don&#8217;t think many would be surprised by, given past reports.</p>
<p>After watching stuff like this <strong>I feel physically sick</strong>. It genuinely terrifies me that the US feel they have any even slight moral authority over any other regime with this torture camp still running. It <strong>sickens</strong> me to the core and I&#8217;m glad it does too.</p>
<p>Is it just me or should children be cut more slack than grown adults? They screw up and one (<em>albeit huge</em>) screw-up shouldn&#8217;t <strong>destroy their life</strong>.</p>
<p>Residents of the US, I really hope your next leader closes this camp down before the rest of the world becomes more <strong>disgusted</strong> that we already are at your <strong>flagrant abuse</strong> of human rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mikemcquaid.com/2008/07/aged-15-life-over/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I have Obamania!</title>
		<link>http://mikemcquaid.com/2008/03/i-have-obamania/</link>
		<comments>http://mikemcquaid.com/2008/03/i-have-obamania/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 23:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikearthur.co.uk/2008/03/04/i-have-obamania/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve got a fever and the only prescription is Barack Obama. I am, like a lot of people in Europe, strangely attracted to the US primaries and the Democratic race in particular (as it is actually still a race). Hearing Barrack Obama talk is pretty inspirational and I&#8217;m not even vaguely a US citizen. He [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got a fever and the only prescription is Barack Obama.</p>
<p>I am, like a lot of people in Europe, strangely attracted to the US primaries and the Democratic race in particular (as it is actually still a race).</p>
<p>Hearing Barrack Obama talk is pretty inspirational and I&#8217;m not even vaguely a US citizen. He seems one of the few politicians who seems to truly believe in what he says and is capturing the hearts of many of the young voters in the US. Ron Paul was a pretty inspirational guy also and I know the Internet loved him but sadly this doesn&#8217;t seem to have actually translated into a huge amount of votes.</p>
<p>Personally, I hope he wins as it would be nice to have a US President with a less aggressive foreign policy.</p>
<p>I leave you with a quote that I think is particularly relevant:</p>
<blockquote><p>
[Obama] said &#8212; and I&#8217;m going to paraphrase a little here: think about who I am &#8212; my father was Kenyan; I have close relatives in a small rural village in Kenya to this day; and I spent several years of my childhood living in Jakarta, Indonesia. Think about what it&#8217;s going to mean in many parts of the world &#8212; parts of the world that we really care about &#8212; when I show up as the President of the United States. I&#8217;ll be fundamentally changing the world&#8217;s perception of what the United States is all about.
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mikemcquaid.com/2008/03/i-have-obamania/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hello. Uhh, can we have your liver?</title>
		<link>http://mikemcquaid.com/2008/01/hello-uhh-can-we-have-your-liver/</link>
		<comments>http://mikemcquaid.com/2008/01/hello-uhh-can-we-have-your-liver/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikearthur.co.uk/index.php/?p=175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The title is from the &#8220;Live Organ Transplants&#8221; sketch on Monty Python&#8217;s &#8220;The Meaning of Life&#8220;. I&#8217;ve seen this referenced a fair bit recently about the British Prime Minister&#8217;s plans to make organ donation opt-out rather than opt-in. Some people seem to be in uproar about this but I can&#8217;t really understand why. At the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The title is from the &#8220;<em>Live Organ Transplants</em>&#8221; sketch on Monty Python&#8217;s &#8220;<em>The Meaning of Life</em>&#8220;. I&#8217;ve seen this referenced a fair bit recently about <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7186007.stm">the British Prime Minister&#8217;s plans to make organ donation opt-out rather than opt-in</a>.</p>
<p>Some people seem to be in uproar about this but I can&#8217;t really understand why. At the moment <strong>many people die</strong> waiting for organ transplants. Many people die with perfectly good organs and no problem with organ donation but never got round to getting a card to signify their consent. This is, in my humble opinion, <strong>stupid and unjust</strong>.</p>
<p>Moving to an opt-out system would <strong>save many lives</strong> so if people have religious/moral/whatever reasons for not wanting their organs removed on death they can stop it happening. The proposed legislation also says that <strong>the family can object</strong> and stop the donation going through so I&#8217;m surprised by peoples&#8217; opposition. Personally I&#8217;d like to be able to still have a donation card so my family <strong>can&#8217;t object</strong> as I don&#8217;t think it is their right to do so.</p>
<p>What do other people think? The state over-reaching again or doing something good? This seems to be working in Spain with organ donation up 250%. Does anyone know any more details of the situation there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mikemcquaid.com/2008/01/hello-uhh-can-we-have-your-liver/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A New Year</title>
		<link>http://mikemcquaid.com/2008/01/a-new-year/</link>
		<comments>http://mikemcquaid.com/2008/01/a-new-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computer Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikearthur.co.uk/index.php/?p=172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;re on the 5th day of 2008. It&#8217;ll probably take me till the 300th day before I remember to write &#8220;2008&#8243; instead of &#8220;2007&#8243;&#8230; Like most people I&#8217;ve made a few New Year&#8217;s resolutions this year whilst trying to take on a few bits of advice on how to make them and keep them. Anyway, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re on the 5th day of 2008. It&#8217;ll probably take me till the 300th day before I remember to write &#8220;2008&#8243; instead of &#8220;2007&#8243;&#8230;</p>
<p>Like most people I&#8217;ve made a few New Year&#8217;s resolutions this year whilst trying to take on a few bits of advice on how to make them and keep them.</p>
<p>Anyway, here goes:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Hack more on KDE</strong>. I think the combination of starting a new job and not running KDE4 as my desktop (until recently) has made me slack from working on KDE. Once I actually am using it daily then I reckon I&#8217;ll be able to do more work and help with KDEPIM for 4.1.</li>
<li><strong>Practise my bass more</strong>. Playing every two weeks with a bunch of music teachers and session musicians is making me feel a little insecure about my playing! I need to practise more, especially working on my soloing and probably buy a Fake book.</li>
<li><strong>Study rather than just reading my Bible</strong>. I&#8217;m normally alright about reading my Bible regularly but I&#8217;ve just been reading it like a novel rather than actually using commentries and then like to properly study the passages. I&#8217;ve done this a few times lately and it is far more beneficial, I need to get up earlier and try and do it more often</li>
<li><strong>Play less computer games</strong>. I do enjoy gaming but it is one of these activities that really benefits no-one except myself so I want to try and divert more time into things like hacking/music where I can benefit others whilst enjoying myself.</li>
<li><strong>Be a better friend/boyfriend</strong>. Just generally take more of my time to try and focus on others and help them with their problems.</li>
<li><strong>Become a better software engineer</strong>. Improve my knowledge of my main languages, maybe try and pick up some more and improving my algorithmic math skills.</li>
<li><strong>Take more of an interest in politics</strong>. Now that Nick Clegg has been elected the leader of the Liberal Democrats I&#8217;ve felt myself want to try and get a little more involved and interested in British politics in the gradual run-up to the next UK elections.</li>
</ol>
<p>I&#8217;m sure there are more but that&#8217;s all I can think of for now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mikemcquaid.com/2008/01/a-new-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rendition</title>
		<link>http://mikemcquaid.com/2007/10/rendition/</link>
		<comments>http://mikemcquaid.com/2007/10/rendition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cinema]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikearthur.co.uk/index.php/?p=158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had the fortune of seeing Rendition on Friday night. Rendition is a film about the US extradition of suspected terrorists to prisons outside of the US where they can be legally tortured. I found the film really enjoyable and thought provoking. The camera work was bordering on beautiful, loads of still shots perpendicular to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the fortune of seeing Rendition on Friday night. Rendition is a film about the US extradition of suspected terrorists to prisons outside of the US where they can be legally tortured.</p>
<p>I found the film really enjoyable and thought provoking. The camera work was bordering on beautiful, loads of still shots perpendicular to flat, bland surfaces helping you to focus in on the characters. The acting was convincing enough but it was the direction and story that really dragged me in and made me think.</p>
<p>I find it completely abhorrent that in the supposedly civilized world of the 21st century politicians are willing to have people tortured to fight an invisible enemy. I find it doubly so that my country is willing to have these prison flights landed and refueled on their soil and allow their citizens to be sent to places like Camp X-Ray to be tortured and abused without trial only to be simply released without any compensation on their innocence being decided.</p>
<p>Coming out the film made me sick to my stomach of the way the world is going as of late. Average people don&#8217;t seem to care that their liberties are being revoked and their country killing hundreds of thousands abroad in an illegal war we entered under deliberately false pretenses.</p>
<p>The thing that saddens me the most is I truly have no idea what I can do. When faced with the power of governments, foreign wars and a populace who neither seems to notice or care I feel impotent and powerless.</p>
<p>Does anyone else have any thoughts on helping with some of these problems? I&#8217;d be interested in hearing your comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mikemcquaid.com/2007/10/rendition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unity against terrorism</title>
		<link>http://mikemcquaid.com/2007/07/unity-against-terrorism/</link>
		<comments>http://mikemcquaid.com/2007/07/unity-against-terrorism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 02:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikearthur.co.uk/index.php/2007/07/04/unity-against-terrorism/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Britain again came under fire from Islamic extremists last week with attempted bombings in London and Glasgow. Thankfully no-one except the one of the perpetrators were hurt and their fairly inept attempts to disrupt and terrorise failed. Two things have stuck in my mind when I finally heard the full story of events. Firstly, I&#8217;m [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Britain again came under fire from Islamic extremists last week with attempted bombings in London and Glasgow. Thankfully no-one except the one of the perpetrators were hurt and their fairly inept attempts to disrupt and terrorise failed.</p>
<p>Two things have stuck in my mind when I finally heard the full story of events.</p>
<p>Firstly, I&#8217;m incredibly unthreatened by these terrorists. The sheer failure to cause any casualties in such crowded areas and the incompetence this shows is staggering. In my ignorant youth a close friend and I made &#8220;bombs&#8221; in his fairly large garden, as young boys tend to do. Our GCSE knowledge of chemistry allowed us to create explosions almost the size of his house, remotely activated with a radio detonator created from an old remote-controlled car. We were never harmed in these explosions and rapidly grew out of them. Considering these men who attacked Glasgow airport seemed to want to die in the explosion their sheer inability is made quite clear. This makes me a lot less intimidated by their attempted scare tactics.</p>
<p>Secondly (seemingly contradicting my first point), I&#8217;m amazed by the political response to these events. Both the Conservatives and Labour seem to be quick to call for &#8220;unity&#8221; and &#8220;bravery&#8221; against &#8220;terrorism&#8221; and &#8220;evil&#8221;. This political rhetoric makes me gawp. I could understand dodging the issues with the July 7th bombings when many people died but not now. No-one seems to be saying what everyone is thinking: &#8220;<em>This wouldn&#8217;t be happening if we didn&#8217;t invade Iraq</em>&#8220;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m far from condoning the actions of the terrorists but we need to ask ourselves how many British casualties we are willing to accept to secure Iraq (read secure our oil supplies). This, in my mind, is another reason to push for renewable energy: to be able to have more self-reliant energy supplies without the need to have an aggressive foreign policy to protect our economic stability.</p>
<p>The worrying thing about this whole affair is that people within our country want to kill us to make us leave the middle east. How many British citizens or Iraqi civilians are going to be sacrificed before we try and get ourselves our of this situation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mikemcquaid.com/2007/07/unity-against-terrorism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Groupthink and justification</title>
		<link>http://mikemcquaid.com/2007/06/groupthink-and-justification/</link>
		<comments>http://mikemcquaid.com/2007/06/groupthink-and-justification/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 02:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[My Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikearthur.co.uk/index.php/2007/06/05/groupthink-and-justification/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Groupthink is a type of thought exhibited by group members who try to minimize conflict and reach consensus without critically testing, analyzing, and evaluating ideas.&#8221;(Wikipedia) Groupthink is something you encounter a lot on the Internet in forums, newsgroups, IRC channels and amongst bloggers. It&#8217;s also something we see a lot in any clique or group [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;Groupthink is a type of thought exhibited by group members who try to minimize conflict and reach consensus without critically testing, analyzing, and evaluating ideas.&#8221;</em><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groupthink">(Wikipedia)</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Groupthink is something you encounter a lot on the Internet in forums, newsgroups, IRC channels and amongst bloggers. It&#8217;s also something we see a lot in any clique or group established around certain opinions or beliefs such as in a church, university course or friendship group.</p>
<p>Groupthink is, in my humble opinion, one of the most dangerous threats to our world and way of life. Moreso than terrorism, moreso than pedophilia, moreso than murderers. The main problem with groupthink is that people become afraid or unwilling to speak out against the majority&#8217;s viewpoint. With modern media this is especially twisted as if all the news channels or newspapers are saying something you tend to assume that is what the British people believe and therefore it is all-too-easy to simply believe what you are told rather than engaging in issues.</p>
<p>The classic way for people to abuse a groupthink is finding a polarising event or decision and then trying to use that to irradicate rational discussion. A classic amusing example of this found on the internet is &#8220;Godwin&#8217;s Law&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;As a [online newsgroup] discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Hitler is a classic example of the type of polarising topic I mentioned. Too often in the media or discussion we hear &#8220;Hitler did X therefore X is BAD!&#8221;. This tends to try and produce a base emotional reaction in order to override an intellectual discussion.</p>
<p>The current big example being used in modern culture seems to be terrorism.</p>
<p>Statistically you are incredibly unlikely to be affected by terrorism but that doesn&#8217;t stop <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6715885.stm">idiots like Brown from trying to turn the UK into a police state</a>. The problem with these new laws is that you are infringing on EVERYONE&#8217;S civil rights in order to attempt to reduce deaths by terrorism which are astronomically small anyway!</p>
<p>This brings me on to the justification part. The evil bogeyman of terrorism is being used to justify all sorts of laws and government action, from wars in the middle-east to clamping down on free speech to allowing our legal system to be subverted.</p>
<p>People will die from terrorism. This is inevitable. The question you should ask yourself is how many of your freedoms, rights and ways of life are you willing to sacrifice to reduce this number. Personally I&#8217;ve reached the limit.</p>
<p>Free speech and many of our other rights are prone to abuse. People say disgustingly horrible things and this is a shame. The problem is if you start saying what people can and can&#8217;t say where do you draw the line? Who draws the lines?</p>
<p>If it becomes illegal for people to say &#8220;terrorist action is the UK is justified&#8221; then what next?</p>
<p>The government is making serious steps toward an Orwellian police state with CCTV, detainment and extradition to the US without charge or trial. The question simply is how much you are willing to sacrifice to maintain your illusion of safety against the terrorists when you are probably more likely to be killed crossing the road.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mikemcquaid.com/2007/06/groupthink-and-justification/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
