Comments on: Google Chrome? http://mikemcquaid.com/2008/09/google-chrome/ the internet is leaking Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:52:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: WP-reCAPTCHA failure… - mike arthur dot co dot you kay http://mikemcquaid.com/2008/09/google-chrome/comment-page-1/#comment-499 WP-reCAPTCHA failure… - mike arthur dot co dot you kay Fri, 26 Sep 2008 23:05:30 +0000 http://mikearthur.co.uk/?p=154#comment-499 [...] in me being spammed to oblivion. Also, if you had anything interesting to say about Spore, Phorm or Chrome then please excuse me being a noob and post [...] [...] in me being spammed to oblivion. Also, if you had anything interesting to say about Spore, Phorm or Chrome then please excuse me being a noob and post [...]

]]> By: Chris H http://mikemcquaid.com/2008/09/google-chrome/comment-page-1/#comment-430 Chris H Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:27:03 +0000 http://mikearthur.co.uk/?p=154#comment-430 Precursor to Google OS? Or just a precursor to the invasion of earth by Google corp? Precursor to Google OS?

Or just a precursor to the invasion of earth by Google corp?

]]> By: Paul Gideon Dann http://mikemcquaid.com/2008/09/google-chrome/comment-page-1/#comment-424 Paul Gideon Dann Wed, 03 Sep 2008 07:15:43 +0000 http://mikearthur.co.uk/?p=154#comment-424 I'm pretty sure that BSD-like licences are compatible with pretty much anything, or at least that's their intention. I think Google would be very wise to use Qt. I'm curious to see how / if they provide an extension framework similar to Firefox's. Will they use a XUL-like interface language? Scripting support à la QtScript? If they don't get that right, they'll certainly not win over the Firefox userbase that relies on extensions (as I do!) I'm very excited to see this develop. I’m pretty sure that BSD-like licences are compatible with pretty much anything, or at least that’s their intention. I think Google would be very wise to use Qt.

I’m curious to see how / if they provide an extension framework similar to Firefox’s. Will they use a XUL-like interface language? Scripting support à la QtScript? If they don’t get that right, they’ll certainly not win over the Firefox userbase that relies on extensions (as I do!) I’m very excited to see this develop.

]]>